Recommended Resources
Back to the Full ToolThere are many ways to structure community-engagement activities. We recommend that researchers learn about community engagement from a wide range of resources. Below is a list of resources that may be helpful to consult to learn more about community engagement methods. Even though there is some overlapping information across these resources, you will find novel strategies, tips, and details based on each team’s unique experiences with community engagement.
Community Engagement/Participatory Research Approaches
These resources offer robust information about conducting community-engaged research, touching on topics at all stages of the process. Some resources included below are not specifically about autism research, but provide important insight regardless.
Autism-Specific Resources
Participatory and Inclusive Autism Research Practice Guides
- This resource provides information about conducting participatory research with autistic people, and also provides information about including autistic people as participants in a research study.
Autistic Adults and other Stakeholders Engage Together Engagement & Compensation Guide
- This resource provides information about a variety of topics related to engaging with autistic people in research including: Presuming competence, compensation, communication strategies, and measuring engagement.
AASPIRE Inclusion Toolkit–Participatory Research
- This resource includes video presentations, written materials, and resources about conducting autism research in partnership with autistic people, with an emphasis on the community-based participatory research framework on CEnR.
A Workbook to Support Community- Engaged Autism Research: Lessons from Project STEER
- This workbook contains guidance and activities to support researchers as they plan and conduct community-engaged research.
Starter Pack: Participatory Autism Research
- This resource provides helpful information to start on the journey of community-engaged autism research.
General Community-Engagement Resources
Principles of Community Engagement: Second Edition
- This resource provides robust information about community engagement, and was created by a task force across the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes for Health (NIH), and other federal agencies in the United States.
Building Effective Multi-Stakeholder Research Teams
- This section of PCORI’s website includes robust guidelines and resources about conducting effective and inclusive community-engaged research.
A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals
- This article describes a wide variety of community-engagement strategies that researchers may use at various stages of the research process.
Stakeholder Engagement Navigator
- This website helps researchers choose engagement strategies based on factors such as their purpose, budget, timeframe, and level of expertise.
Models of Disability, Neurodiversity, and Ableism in Autism Research
Botha M, Cage E. “Autism research is in crisis”: A mixed method study of researcher’s constructions of autistic people and autism research. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1050897
Bottema-Beutel K, Kapp SK, Sasson N, Gernsbacher MA, Natri H, Botha M. Anti-ableism and scientific accuracy in autism research: a false dichotomy. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1244451
Bottema-Beutel K, Kapp SK, Lester JN, Sasson NJ, Hand BN. Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers. Autism in Adulthood. Published online September 2, 2020. doi:10.1089/aut.2020.0014
Dwyer P. The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers? Hum Dev. 2022;66(2):73-92. doi:10.1159/000523723
For Whose Benefit?: Evidence, Ethics, and Effectiveness of Autism Interventions – Autistic Self Advocacy Network. https://autisticadvocacy.org/. December 6, 2021. Accessed April 3, 2024. https://autisticadvocacy.org/policy/briefs/intervention-ethics/
Kapp SK, ed. Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement: Stories from the Frontline. Springer; 2020. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0
Leadbitter K, Buckle KL, Ellis C, Dekker M. Autistic Self-Advocacy and the Neurodiversity Movement: Implications for Autism Early Intervention Research and Practice. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. Accessed November 8, 2022. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635690
Pellicano E, den Houting J. Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2022;63(4):381-396. doi:10.1111/jcpp.13534
Pickard H, Pellicano E, den Houting J, Crane L. Participatory autism research: Early career and established researchers’ views and experiences. Autism. 2022;26(1):75-87. doi:10.1177/13623613211019594
Tan DW. Early-Career Autism Researchers Are Shifting Their Research Directions: Tragedy or Opportunity? Autism in Adulthood. 2023;5(3):218-224. doi:10.1089/aut.2023.0021
Walker N. Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms and Definitions. August 1, 2021. Accessed August 24, 2024. https://neuroqueer.com/neurodiversity-terms-and-definitions/
Racial and ethnic equity and inclusion in autism and early childhood research
Greenfield PM. Studying social change, culture, and human development: A theoretical framework and methodological guidelines. Developmental Review. 2018;50:16-30. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2018.05.003
Maye M, Boyd BA, Martínez-Pedraza F, Halladay A, Thurm A, Mandell DS. Biases, Barriers, and Possible Solutions: Steps Towards Addressing Autism Researchers Under-Engagement with Racially, Ethnically, and Socioeconomically Diverse Communities. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52(9):4206-4211. doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05250-y
Norbury CF, Sparks A. Difference or disorder? Cultural issues in understanding neurodevelopmental disorders. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(1):45-58. doi:10.1037/a0027446
Soto-Boykin XT, Larson AL, Olszewski A, Velury V, Feldberg A. Who Is Centered? A Systematic Review of Early Childhood Researchers’ Descriptions of Children and Caregivers From Linguistically Minoritized Communities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 2021;41(1):18-30. doi:10.1177/0271121421991222
Williams EDG, Smith MJ, Boyd B. Perspective: The role of diversity advisory boards in autism research. Autism. 2023;27(3):864-869. doi:10.1177/13623613221133633
Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In: Handbook of Child Psychology. American Cancer Society; 2007. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
García Coll C, Lamberty G, Jenkins R, et al. An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Dev. 1996;67(5):1891-1914.
Additional Readings on Community Engagement and Related Topics
Why Am I Always Being Researched? Chicago Beyond. https://wp.chicagobeyond.org/insights/philanthropy/why-am-i-always-being-researched/
Cyril S, Smith BJ, Possamai-Inesedy A, Renzaho AMN. Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:29842. doi:10.3402/gha.v8.29842
Mathie A, Cunningham G. From clients to citizens: Asset-based Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development. Development in Practice. 2003;13(5):474-486. doi:10.1080/0961452032000125857
Nzinga K, Rapp DN, Leatherwood C, et al. Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(45):11435-11441. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721167115
Odedina FT, Wieland ML, Barbel-Johnson K, Crook JM. Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2024;99(1):159-171. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.015
Ramanadhan S, Alemán R, Bradley CD, et al. Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2024;45(1):47-67. doi:10.1146/annurevpublhealth- 060722-024251
Rogers, L. O., Moffitt, U., McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (2024). Research as resistance: Naming and dismantling the master narrative of “good” science. American Psychologist, 79(4), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001246